Skip to main content

Dear Manager : How to conduct successful recruitment interviews (Part 1) #InterviewProcedure #InterviewToSelect


Everybody knows how to conduct interviews. Right? After all, what can be so difficult about asking a few job-related questions and eliciting answers from an eager and rather nervous candidate? And the company brief is already with you, so you are aware of the job duties and responsibilities for the position you are hiring for.

But statistics prove this assertion quite wrong. Studies show that almost 80% of new recruits are found unsuitable for the job, and have to be trained and groomed extensively before they can show some results. Further alarming statistics inform that even skilled and qualified recruits find themselves maladjusted for the position they have been selected for, and either leave after a couple of months, or stay on showing minimal performance.

Now attrition or mismatch between company culture and individual values cannot be attributed solely to the ineffectiveness of the recruitment interview. But much of the success of the employment process depends on how far the interviewer has been successful in selecting not only the most qualified, but the best-suited candidate. 

Therefore, it can be safely concluded that most interviewers need to brush up their skills and techniques in conducting effective interviews.

This is not to say that the HR person is the only one qualified to conduct smart interviews, though they are the ones most familiar with corporate culture and organizational values, and understand motivation and attitude better. Line managers, however, have the distinct advantage of understanding the requirements of the job in and out, so they can assess technical aptitude and functional skills in a manner no one else can.

But, whatever your functional responsibilities are, with a little preparation and training, you too can make a success of the interviews you conduct.

Let’s start at the beginning. After you are handed the shortlist of suitable candidates, and are given the brief for conducting interviews, what preparation do you take? (Tick the option you follow)

a) Check the job description and specifications, draw up a list of appropriate questions to ask, decide on the parameters on which to evaluate the candidates;
Or
 b) You are running against time, so you just sit through the interview, meet the guys, and depend on your gut instinct to select the right person.

If you are a busy executive, hard pressed for time, racing against deadlines, chances are you do the latter. That is, conduct the interview without proper preparation.

But common sense tells us that as with all other management functions, the interviewing and selection process requires proper planning and goal setting. Much of the success of execution and delivery depends on the thought process that has gone into it.

It is a given that you will assess the candidate for skills, knowledge and abilities. However, it may be worthwhile to make this checklist before you hold the interviews:

?         Is the candidate willing to listen?
?         Is he/she enthusiastic, flexible and willing to learn?
?         Does the candidate have the right competencies for the job? (Refer to the competency manual)
?         Does he/she fit into the company culture? Are his/her values compatible with company values?
?         Has he/she been able to prove his/her abilities in the past?
?         How does he/she refer to the previous employer/job? Positively/negatively?

You will find yourself mentally ticking the boxes while speaking to prospective candidates. Checking on these parameters will involve a lot of non-judgmental assessment on your part. 

You have to consciously remove bias and pre-determined notions from your judgment.

Which brings me to the most important part of taking interviews, i.e., impartial evaluation of candidates.

Are you falling in the trap of selecting people who mirror you in personality and thinking? Check yourself and keep the interview grounded to the requirements of the job. A good way to do this may be to include another person for a second opinion. Another way would be to prepare a set of questions and expected responses beforehand, taking the help of someone who has handled the job well in the past. This way, you can firmly keep your bias in check, and stick to the pre-determined format in the interview.

In my next post I will discuss some important steps of conducting successful job interviews. Keep reading ! :)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Self-Supported Publishing - Boon or Scam?

When I started writing stories, I felt some people would find solace in my words. The purpose wasn't to earn money through selling books, but yes, money would be welcome when it came. The idea was to provide readers with something they could connect with. As it is, the process of writing involves immense churning within, and exhaustive editing and finishing after you have finally written what you want to. Any creator will tell you it is almost like birthing a child. Self-doubt assails you, you get nervous and unsure about your work, you aren't sure the denouement is looking apt, or the characters are relatable.  Then comes the commercial aspect of it all - as a new writer, you have to keep an eye on the reader's liking, avoid esoteric words and concepts, and make your content readable and catchy. Finally, what starts is the toughest part. Yes. Finding a publisher for your work.  Common Publishing Models For the uninitiated, there are basically two types of publishing models...

Enough! No more rape!

The recent horrifying, stomach-churning incident in Kolkata is not a one-time aberration. It keeps occuring in our country. And we women are also responsible for this stinking rot in society. Ask yourself these uncomfortable questions. How many of you protest when a girl wearing "revealing clothes" is cat-called?  Did you show your support for our wrestlers protesting against a habitual offender? Did your blood boil when you saw pictures of our sisters in Manipur paraded naked?  When rapists are released from prison or routinely escape punishment, do you raise your voice? How many of you have tolerated violence or even casual sexism in your own home? Do you turn the other way when transgenders are leered at? Do you grin and bear it when the men in your family crack obscene jokes? Do Kathua and Hathras ring a bell? And lastly, how many of you thronged cinema halls to make misogynistic horrors like Animal and Kabir Singh blockbusters? I have asked myself and am distinctly feeli...

Laapataa Ladies - the Unfortunate Story of Lost Women

Laapataa Ladies is a deceptively simple, yet extremely thought-provoking satire couched in a simple story of exchanged brides. Image Source: IMdB This is the unfortunate story of countless ordinary women living under the veil, in the shadow of uncaring men. Who can't remember any details of their husband or the sasural they are married into. Who are trained only to obey their husband, do their duty in the kitchen, and follow orders of in-laws. Who don't have the liberty to study or do something for their own betterment. What can we expect for such women, except a lifetime of slavery? If the husband happens to be good, then there's some ray of hope. If he's a rascal, then God save her. Thanks to Kiran Rao for addressing the woes of 80% of Indian women living in nameless villages. And thanks for calling out the "greatest fraud" - the fraud of getting ready for marriage and domesticity. Where you can make the perfect kalakand, but you can't find your way...